- What is an example of discriminant validity?
- How do you measure concurrent validity?
- What is an example of construct validity?
- What makes good internal validity?
- How do you talk about validity?
- Which one of the following is a threat to internal validity?
- What is the difference between validity and reliability?
- What is the difference between content validity and construct validity?
- How do you explain construct validity?
- How do you measure validity?
- What is a good validity score?
- What factors affect internal validity?
- Why do questionnaires lack validity?
- Can you have reliability without validity?
- What determines internal validity?
- What does validity mean?
- What is criterion validity in research?
- What are the 4 types of validity?
- What are the two types of criterion validity?
- How is validity and reliability measured?
- What is an example of external validity?
What is an example of discriminant validity?
Discriminant validity tests whether believed unrelated constructs are, in fact, unrelated.
Discriminant validity would ensure that, in the study, the non-overlapping factors do not overlap.
For example, self esteem and intelligence should not relate (too much) in most research projects..
How do you measure concurrent validity?
Concurrent validity is usually measured by the correlation between a new test and an existing test to demonstrate whether the new test correlates well with the existing test (Murphy & Davidshofer, 1998). Therefore, the resulting correlation is a concurrent validity coefficient.
What is an example of construct validity?
Construct validity refers to whether a scale or test measures the construct adequately. An example is a measurement of the human brain, such as intelligence, level of emotion, proficiency or ability. … An example could be a doctor testing the effectiveness of painkillers on chronic back sufferers.
What makes good internal validity?
Internal validity is the extent to which a study establishes a trustworthy cause-and-effect relationship between a treatment and an outcome. … In short, you can only be confident that your study is internally valid if you can rule out alternative explanations for your findings.
How do you talk about validity?
You can increase the validity of an experiment by controlling more variables, improving measurement technique, increasing randomization to reduce sample bias, blinding the experiment, and adding control or placebo groups.
Which one of the following is a threat to internal validity?
Eight threats to internal validity have been defined: history, maturation, testing, instrumentation, regression, selection, experimental mortality, and an interaction of threats.
What is the difference between validity and reliability?
Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions). Validity refers to the accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).
What is the difference between content validity and construct validity?
Construct validity means the test measures the skills/abilities that should be measured. Content validity means the test measures appropriate content.
How do you explain construct validity?
What is Construct Validity? Construct validity is one way to test the validity of a test; it’s used in education, the social sciences, and psychology. It demonstrates that the test is actually measuring the construct it claims it’s measuring.
How do you measure validity?
Validity of an assessment is the degree to which it measures what it is supposed to measure. This is not the same as reliability, which is the extent to which a measurement gives results that are very consistent. Within validity, the measurement does not always have to be similar, as it does in reliability.
What is a good validity score?
Table 1. General Guidelines forReliability coefficient valueInterpretation.90 and upexcellent.80 – .89good.70 – .79adequatebelow .70may have limited applicability1 more row
What factors affect internal validity?
Here are some factors which affect internal validity:Subject variability.Size of subject population.Time given for the data collection or experimental treatment.History.Attrition.Maturation.Instrument/task sensitivity.
Why do questionnaires lack validity?
Questionnaires are said to often lack validity for a number of reasons. Participants may lie; give answers that are desired and so on. A way of assessing the validity of self-report measures is to compare the results of the self-report with another self-report on the same topic. (This is called concurrent validity).
Can you have reliability without validity?
A test can be reliable, meaning that the test-takers will get the same score no matter when or where they take it, within reason of course. … A test can be reliable without being valid. However, a test cannot be valid unless it is reliable.
What determines internal validity?
Internal validity is the extent to which you can be confident that a cause-and-effect relationship established in a study cannot be explained by other factors. … Internal validity is the degree of confidence that the causal relationship you are testing is not influenced by other factors or variables.
What does validity mean?
: the quality or state of being valid: such as. a : the state of being acceptable according to the law The validity of the contract is being questioned.
What is criterion validity in research?
Criterion validity is an estimate of the extent to which a measure agrees with a gold standard (i.e., an external criterion of the phenomenon being measured). The major problem in criterion validity testing, for questionnaire-based measures, is the general lack of gold standards.
What are the 4 types of validity?
The four types of validityConstruct validity: Does the test measure the concept that it’s intended to measure?Content validity: Is the test fully representative of what it aims to measure?Face validity: Does the content of the test appear to be suitable to its aims?More items…•
What are the two types of criterion validity?
There are two main types of criterion validity: concurrent validity and predictive validity. … Predictive validity, however, is determined by seeing how likely it is that test scores predict future job performance.
How is validity and reliability measured?
Reliability can be estimated by comparing different versions of the same measurement. Validity is harder to assess, but it can be estimated by comparing the results to other relevant data or theory.
What is an example of external validity?
For example, extraneous variables may be competing with the independent variable to explain the study outcome. Some specific examples of threats to external validity: … In some experiments, pretests may influence the outcome. A pretest might clue the subjects in about the ways they are expected to answer or behave.